+1 for changing to major version given the list of items being covered in the release.
Agree with Jacky's comment on IUD, lets correct it to Update/Delete support instead of IUD. Best Regards, Aniket On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Jacky Li <jacky.li...@qq.com> wrote: > +1, > and comments inline > > > 在 2016年11月24日，上午12:09，Venkata Gollamudi <g.ramana...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > Hi All, > > > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with lot of > > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-320?jql=project%20%3D% > 20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.2.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY% > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > > Next version has many major and new value added features are planned, > > taking CarbonData capability to next level. > > Like > > - IUD(Insert-Update-Delete) support, > > Actually, the design doc Aniket has shared is for Update and Delete only, > Insert is not covered. I think Insert is a feature need to be designed in > the future. > > > - complete rewrite of data load flow with out Kettle, > > - Spark 2.x support, > > Since Spark2.x has made changes to user level API and SQL, it will also > make some CarbonData’s SQL command incompatible with earlier version. So I > think upgrading CarbonData version to 1.0.0 also indicating this > incompatibility. > > > - Standardize CarbonInputFormat and CarbonOutputFormat, > > - alluxio(tachyon) file system support, > > - Carbon thrift format optimization for fast query, > > - Data loading performance improvement and In memory off heap sorting, > > - Query performance improvement using off heap, > > - Support Vectorized batch reader. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-301?jql=project%20%3D% > 20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.3.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY% > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC > > > > I think it makes sense to change CarbonData Major version in next version > > to 1.0.0. > > Please comment and vote on this. > > > > Thanks, > > Ramana > > > >
