+1. i think it's natural for that big changes will made. another reason is,carbon is stable enough after many bug fixed.
Regards Jay ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Lion.X";<lionx.hua...@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, Nov 26, 2016 09:47 AM To: "dev"<dev@carbondata.incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for nextversion (to 1.0.0) +1 I think it is a good choice because the new features add into next version are disruptive changes in carbon architecture. Regards, Lionx -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3217.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
