+1 I think it is a good choice because the new features add into next version are disruptive changes in carbon architecture.
Regards, Lionx -- View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3217.html Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
