And +1 to ditching the "tick tock" alternating release thing nobody understands it anyway.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:38 PM Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote: > From a community perspective a supported release every 6 months would be > much more attractive than yearly, as having to wait ~9-10 months for > something like SASI is kind of frustrating. > > Monthly dev releases is awesome. > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I’m not sure it makes sense to have separate features/stability releases > in that world. 4.0.x will be stable, every 4.x will be a dev release on the > road to 5.0. > > > +1. Much easier to understand and it's 'backwards compatible' (sort > of) with wherever we leave 3.x. > > Still keeping 4.x on monthly cadence should keep the small, incremental > focus. > >
