+1 On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vinay Chella <[email protected]> wrote:
> We have been using Zstd compressor across different products/services here > and have seen significant improvements, getting this in 4.0 would be a big > win. > > +1 > > Thanks, > Vinay Chella > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:19 AM Jeff Jirsa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > Jeff Jirsa > > > > > > > On Feb 15, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Jonathan Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > IMO "add a new compression class that has demonstrable benefits to > Sushma > > > and Joseph" is sufficiently noninvasive that we should allow it into > 4.0. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dinesh Joshi > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hey folks, > > >> > > >> Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd > support. > > >> The consensus on the ticket was that it’s a very valuable addition > > without > > >> any risk of destabilizing 4.0. It’s ready to go if there aren’t any > > >> objections. > > >> > > >> Dinesh > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Jonathan Ellis > > > co-founder, http://www.datastax.com > > > @spyced > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- Dikang
