>
> The unofficial rule is to not upgrade to prod till .10 is cut.

FWIW, I believe it's historically .6. Which is still not a great look for
the project.

There's a ton of work going into testing 4.0 already.

While I intuitively and anecdotally (from the people I've backchanneled
with) believe this to be true as well, the referenced wiki page[1] and
jql[2] doesn't look like it's an up to date reflection of the testing
efforts going on. Is there another place this information is stored /
queryable we can surface to people to keep us all coordinated?

[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/4.0+Quality%3A+Components+and+Test+Plans
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14862?jql=project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20%20labels%20%3D%204.0-QA

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:57 PM sankalp kohli <kohlisank...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>            When you say 4.0 release, how do u match it with 3.0 minor
> releases. The unofficial rule is to not upgrade to prod till .10 is cut.
> Also due to heavy investment in testing, I dont think it will take as long
> as 3.0 but want to know what is your thinking with this.
>
> Thanks,
> Sankalp
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
>
> > Sept is a pretty long ways off.  I think the ideal case is we can
> announce
> > 4.0 release at the summit.  I'm not putting this as a "do or die" date,
> and
> > I don't think we need to announce it or make promises.  Sticking with
> "when
> > it's ready" is the right approach, but we need a target, and this is imo
> a
> > good one.
> >
> > This date also gives us a pretty good runway.  We could cut our first
> > alphas in mid June / early July, betas in August and release in Sept.
> >  There's a ton of work going into testing 4.0 already.
> > Landing CASSANDRA-15066 will put us in a pretty good spot.  We've
> developed
> > tooling at TLP that will make it a lot easier to spin up dev clusters in
> > AWS as well as stress test them.  I've written about this a few times in
> > the past, and I'll have a few blog posts coming up that will help show
> this
> > in more details.
> >
> > There's some other quality of life things we should try to hammer out
> > before then.  Updating our default JVM settings would be nice, for
> > example.  Improving documentation (the data modeling section in
> > particular), fixing the dynamic snitch issues [1], and some improvements
> to
> > virtual tables like exposing the sstable metadata [2], and exposing table
> > statistics [3] come to mind.  The dynamic snitch improvement will help
> > performance in a big way, and the virtual tables will go a long way to
> > helping with quality of life.  I showed a few folks virtual tables at the
> > Accelerate conference last week and the missing table statistics was a
> big
> > shock.  If we can get them in, it'll be a big help to operators.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14459
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14630
> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14572
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:36 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sumanth,
> > > Thank you so much for taking the time to put this together.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > -Nate
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:27 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti <
> > > sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have taken an initial stab at documenting release types and exit
> > > criteria
> > > > in a google doc, to get us started, and to collaborate on.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit?usp=sharing
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sumanth
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:04 PM Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sankalp,
> > > > >
> > > > > Great point. This is the page created for testing.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/4.0+Quality%3A+Components+and+Test+Plans
> > > > >
> > > > > I think we need to define the various release types and the exit
> > > criteria
> > > > > for each type of release. Anybody want to take a stab at this or
> > start
> > > a
> > > > > thread to discuss it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Dinesh
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On May 23, 2019, at 11:57 AM, sankalp kohli <
> > kohlisank...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >    Is there a page where it is written what is expected from an
> > > alpha,
> > > > > > beta, rc and a 4.0 release?
> > > > > > Also how are we coming up with Q4 2019 timeline. Is this for
> alpha,
> > > > beta,
> > > > > > rc or 4.0 release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sankalp
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:27 AM Attila Wind
> > <attilaw@swf.technology
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1+1+1 I read a blog post was talking about last sept(?) to
> freeze
> > > > > >> features and start extensive testing. Maybe its really time to
> hit
> > > it!
> > > > > :-)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Attila Wind
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/attilaw
> > > > > >> Mobile: +36 31 7811355
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On 2019. 05. 23. 19:30, ajs6f wrote:
> > > > > >>> +1 in the fullest degree. A date that needs to be changed is
> > still
> > > > > >> enormously more attractive than no date at all.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Adam Soroka
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> On May 23, 2019, at 12:01 PM, Sumanth Pasupuleti <
> > > > > >> spasupul...@netflix.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Having at least a ballpark target on the website will
> definitely
> > > > help.
> > > > > >> +1
> > > > > >>>> on setting it to Q4 2019 for now.
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dinesh Joshi <
> djo...@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> +1 on setting a date.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Dinesh
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On May 23, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Michael Shuler <
> > > > > mich...@pbandjelly.org>
> > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>> We've had 4.0 listed as TBD release date for a very long
> time.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Yesterday, Alexander Dejanovski got a "when's 4.0 going to
> > > > release?"
> > > > > >>>>> question after his repair talk and he suggested possibly Q4
> > 2019.
> > > > > This
> > > > > >>>>> morning Nate McCall hinted at possibly being close by
> ApacheCon
> > > Las
> > > > > >> Vegas
> > > > > >>>>> in September. These got me thinking..
> > > > > >>>>>> Think we can we shoot for having a 4.0 alpha/beta/rc ready
> to
> > > > > >>>>> announce/release at ApacheCon? At that time, we'll have been
> > > frozen
> > > > > >> for 1
> > > > > >>>>> year, and I think we can. We'll GA release when it's ready,
> > but I
> > > > > >> think Q4
> > > > > >>>>> could be an realistic target.
> > > > > >>>>>> With that said, I'd like to change "TBD" on the downloads
> page
> > > to
> > > > > >> "Est.
> > > > > >>>>> Q4 2019". We can always push or pull the estimate, but I
> think
> > > it's
> > > > > >> time to
> > > > > >>>>> have a goal line. This lines up with ApacheCon nicely for a
> > > preview
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >>>>>> Any concerns or objections to editing the download page?
> Have
> > > some
> > > > > >> other
> > > > > >>>>> goal timeframe in mind?
> > > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > > >>>>>> Warm regards,
> > > > > >>>>>> Michael
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to