Hi Michael,
Thanks for putting very clever information " Users of MVs *must* determine for
themselves, through
thorough testing and understanding, if they wish to use them." And this
concluded that if there is any issue occur in future then only solution is to
rebuild the MVs since Cassandra does not able to make consistent synch well.
Also, we practically using the 10+ MVs and as of now, we have not faced any
issue, so my question to all community member, does anyone face any critical
issues ? so we need to start migration from MVs to manual query base table ?
Also, I can understand now, it's experimental and not ready for production, so
if possible, please ignore it only right ?
Thanks
Pankaj
On 27/08/19, 19:03, "Michael Shuler" <[email protected] on behalf of
[email protected]> wrote:
It appears that you found the first message of the chain. I suggest
reading the linked JIRA and the complete dev@ thread that arrived at
this conclusion; there are loads of well formed opinions and
information. Users of MVs *must* determine for themselves, through
thorough testing and understanding, if they wish to use them.
Linkage:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13959
(sub-linkage..)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13595
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13911
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13880
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12872
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13747
Very much worth reading the complete thread:
part1:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d81a61da48e1b872d7599df4edfa8e244d34cbd591a18539f724796f@<dev.cassandra.apache.org>
part2:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19b7fcfd3b47f1526d6e993b3bb97f6c43e5ce204bc976ec0701cdd3@<dev.cassandra.apache.org>
Quick JQL for open tickets with "mv":
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CASSANDRA%20AND%20text%20~%20mv%20AND%20status%20!%3D%20Resolved
--
Michael
On 8/27/19 5:01 AM, pankaj gajjar wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> concern about Materialized Views (MVs) in Cassandra. Unfortunately
starting
> with version 3.11, MVs are officially considered experimental and not
ready
> for production use, as you can read here:
>
>
>
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cassandra-user/201710.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
>
>
>
> Can you please someone give some productive feedback on this ? it would
> help us to further implementation around the MVs in Cassandra.
>
>
>
> Does anyone facing some critical issue or data lose or synchronization
> issue ?
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Pankaj.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
