Plays pretty cleanly into the "have a test plan" we modded in last month. +1
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:43 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > If so, I propose we set this thread down for now in deference to us > > articulating the quality bar we set and how we achieve it for features in > > the DB and then retroactively apply them to existing experimental > features. > > Should we determine nobody is stepping up to maintain an > > experimental feature in a reasonable time frame, we can cross the bridge > of > > the implications of scale of adoption and the perceived impact on the > user > > community of deprecation and removal at that time. > > > > We should make sure we back-haul this into the CEP process so new > features/large changes have to provide some idea of what the gates are to > be production ready. >
