I feel that we are going into a too restrictive direction. I believe that we have more to win by being open and welcoming. -1 for the strict approach and for the licences.
Le mar. 29 juin 2021 à 00:40, Ben Bromhead <b...@instaclustr.com> a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 2:38 AM Joshua McKenzie <jmcken...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > The obvious core responsibility of the website should be to ASLv2 > > permissively licensed Apache Cassandra and secondarily to CQL as a > protocol > > IMO. I don't think we as a project should be tracking derivative works, > > forks, or other things built on top of the code-base and certainly not > > things with wildly varied licensing (AGPL, proprietary closed, etc). > > > > To go that route we either become fully inclusive of everything or become > > Kingmakers, and either way there's the consequence of inconsistent levels > > of vetting, maintenance, and dilution of what it means to "be Cassandra". > > There's plenty of other websites for other projects and everyone has > access > > to search engines. > > > > This makes sense to me as a line in the sand to draw if we are going down a > strict path. > > It would be up to whoever wants to be added to the list to demonstrate this > is the case. > > There would still be some degree of honesty required as well on the service > providers part. >
