+1. If a need comes up for Javadoc we can fix it at that point, but I suspect most people are not looking at Javadoc when working on the codebase.
Cheers, Derek On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:11 AM Brandon Williams <dri...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think even if it works anyone is going to use the output, so > I'm good with removal. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:50 AM Ekaterina Dimitrova > <e.dimitr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > We were looking into a user report around our ant javadoc task recently. > > That made us realize it is not run in CI; it finishes successfully even > if there are hundreds of errors, some potentially breaking doc pages. > > > > There was a ticket discussion where a few community members mentioned > that this task was probably unnecessary. Can we remove it, or shall we fix > it? > > > > Best regards, > > Ekaterina > -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Derek Chen-Becker | | GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and | | https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org | | Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7 7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
