+1 On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 10:08 AM Jon Haddad <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 8:54 AM Francisco Guerrero <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 2026/09/29 15:52:39 Christopher Bradford wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > Christopher Bradford >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 11:18 AM Bernardo Botella < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > *From: *Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> >> > > *Date: *Tuesday, 29 September 2026 at 17:01 >> > > *To: *dev <[email protected]> >> > > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026, at 9:40 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > On Tue, 29 Sept 2026 at 15:12, Abe Ratnofsky <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > +1 >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026, at 6:16 AM, Brandon Williams wrote: >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Kind Regards, >> > > > > Brandon >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:41 PM Chris Lohfink < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> I'd like to call a vote on CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The proposal splits eligible compressed SSTables by reusing their >> > > encoded compression chunks and rebuilding the child components, >> avoiding a >> > > row rewrite. It starts with an opt-in sstablesplit --zero-copy mode >> for >> > > split tool and BIG-format SSTables on Cassandra 7.0/trunk. Reflinks >> provide >> > > an additional optimization where supported; otherwise, Cassandra >> copies the >> > > encoded bytes. Follow-up incremental phases cover Spark support, >> > > anticompaction, BTI, 2i, and partial-range zero copy streaming. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> The discussion covered the new SSTable format, compatibility, >> reflink >> > > complexity, and digest generation. The proposal and discussion are >> here: >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Proposal: >> > > > >> >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/CASSANDRA/pages/451972773/draft+CEP-66+Zero-copy+SSTable+splitting >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Discussion: >> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sjqbv0m451kqopms8whymgwbrr2v16tw >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Please cast your vote in this thread. The vote will remain open >> for >> > > at least 72 hours, longer if needed. Per the CEP process, adoption >> requires >> > > three binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Thanks, >> > > > >> Chris >> > > >> > > >> > >> >
