Hi, The discussion is still ongoing, so this vote should note have been concluded.
On 2026/10/02 22:07:01 Chris Lohfink wrote: > Hi everyone, > > With no further discussion, the vote on CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting > is complete. > > +1 binding: *16* > +1 non-binding: *2* > 0: *0* > -1: *0* > > With at least three binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes, the vote passes. > > Vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/gg909ydhh7n0p94cwg6gm18fv1xl3lfy > > Thanks to everyone who voted and contributed to the discussion. > > Chris > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 6:56 PM Chris Lohfink <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I’ll answer them in the DISCUSS thread so the technical discussion stays > > together. > > > > Chris > > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 5:08 PM Benedict Elliott Smith <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> Did you miss my email[1] on the DISCUSS thread? Abe partially responded > >> to it, and I found his answer to this part satisfactory, but I would > >> appreciate discussing the remaining items before we move to a VOTE. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/07c52dv46xk4hynknfb42kkh424r3o1y > >> > >> On 2026-09-28 20:40 UTC Chris Lohfink wrote: > >> > I'd like to call a vote on CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting. > >> > > >> > The proposal splits eligible compressed SSTables by reusing their > >> encoded > >> > compression chunks and rebuilding the child components, avoiding a row > >> > rewrite. It starts with an opt-in sstablesplit --zero-copy mode for > >> split > >> > tool and BIG-format SSTables on Cassandra 7.0/trunk. Reflinks provide an > >> > additional optimization where supported; otherwise, Cassandra copies the > >> > encoded bytes. Follow-up incremental phases cover Spark support, > >> > anticompaction, BTI, 2i, and partial-range zero copy streaming. > >> > > >> > The discussion covered the new SSTable format, compatibility, reflink > >> > complexity, and digest generation. The proposal and discussion are here: > >> > > >> > Proposal: > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/CASSANDRA/pages/451972773/draft+CEP-66+Zero-copy+SSTable+splitting > >> > < > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/CASSANDRA/pages/451972773/draft+CEP-66+Zero-copy+SSTable+splitting > >> > > >> > > >> > Discussion: > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sjqbv0m451kqopms8whymgwbrr2v16tw > >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/sjqbv0m451kqopms8whymgwbrr2v16tw> > >> > > >> > Please cast your vote in this thread. The vote will remain open for at > >> > least 72 hours, longer if needed. Per the CEP process, adoption requires > >> > three binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > > >
