>From what I understand, it's not JDBC that's not supported, but the lack of a Google Apps Engine JDBC driver.
I haven't tried it, but it seems like it'd be easy enough set up. Yes, reflection isn't supported. Again, though, I think the real fitting point is not getting Cayenne to run in entirety on the app engine as a java -> javascript translated byte code, but to make sure that client-side ROP works on the apps engine, with Cayenne running on the server-side. On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Joseph Schmidt wrote: >> >> Can cayenne run on the new Google AppEngine/Java? >> >> I'm asking this because there are quite some restrictions to the >> applications that work, and many known frameworks don't work (but the >> authors promised to make them work - e.g. Tapestry): >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/web/will-it-play-in-app-engine >> >> e.g. Hibernate does not work (maybe this might be the chance for Cayenne >> to get some more publicity if it could work :) ?). >> >> thanks, >> Joseph. > > A good question... > > IIRC Google apps engine does not support JDBC? So that will be a > showstopper, although the stack is abstracted well enough so that it should > be possible to re-implement a non-JDBC DataNode. Otherwise Cayenne does not > rely on reflection for CayenneDataObjects, and should be possible to port > ... I think. > >> maybe this might be the chance for Cayenne to get some more publicity if >> it could work :) ?). > > > This might also be a chance for new Cayenne volunteers to get publicity ;) > > Andrus >
