I've been looking at the low level api a bit more.
I think our best bet is to write a db adapter, rather than a jdbc
driver (although the jdbc driver would be interesting as it would
enable a much broader range of persistence support, ie, not cayenne-
centric).
I may play with this idea some. Definitely... intrigued. :)
Robert
On Apr 10, 2009, at 4/101:06 PM , Mike Kienenberger wrote:
A little bit more on the topic since there's some interest:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Max Ross <[email protected]>
Date: Apr 8, 4:59 pm
Subject: Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)
To: Google App Engine for Java
Sounds very interesting! It would certainly open up a lot of
additional
frameworks for use on App Engine. I can't think of any security
restrictions that would prevent you from implementing a jdbc driver
that
wraps the datastore service, so by all means go for it!
Max
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Mueller
<[email protected]
I am the author of the H2 Database Engine, and I think about writing
an open source "JDBC to com.google.appengine.api.datastore wrapper".
That way people can use SQL and the JDBC API (or other libraries that
use it).
