Anyways, I'm ok with reverting CAY-1009 but reopening it for 3.1 2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <[email protected]>
> However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically without > knowing name of relationship... Not sure though > > 2010/2/10 Andrey Razumovsky <[email protected]> > > >>> >>> Now back to 3.0... Could you explain why there is a mismatch in the >>> mapping? I.e. why can't you remap (A -> C ; C -> B) as either (A -> C ; C -> >>> A) or (B -> C ; C -> B) from the application design perspective? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >> >> In my case I don't have obj relationships A->C or B->C at all because I >> don't need them. Only C->B, others are runtime > > > > > -- > Andrey > -- Andrey
