On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
However, I think I could have called addToRelated() programmically
without
knowing name of relationship... Not sure though
I just tried with a one-way to-many relationship, and that works, as
runtime relationships are added correctly if there's no explicit sub/
superclass relationship mismatch.
Anyways, I'm ok with reverting CAY-1009 but reopening it for 3.1
I will do that. I think there is a clear workaround for all affected
users (and I still don't understand why people use the type of mapping
that is causing the problem. It doesn't look logically correct to me).
Andrus
