Will this get rid of the Cayenne 2.0 docs? I'm pretty sure some are still using that (like Mike K).
mrg On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >>> >>> (1) continues to tick another as is, until I have time to spend on learning >>> Apache CMS, navigating a bunch of obscure Perl, etc. >>> >>> >>> As for old CAYDOC, I don't see why we'd want to delete old documentation. >>> That is still useful. >> >> We have 4 versions of the documentation with the wiki process - (a) dynamic >> on Wiki, (b) autoexported on wiki (cwiki.apache.org), (c) cloned from (b) to >> our site, (d) - specially formatted version of (a) in SVN. My suggestion is >> to remove (a) and (b) as we don't need them, but keep the (c) and (d). > > So a last chance to stop the deletion of these spaces... Planning to do it > tomorrow. > >
