Yes, please don't delete any old cayenne documentation if those documents cannot be found elsewhere.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: > Will this get rid of the Cayenne 2.0 docs? I'm pretty sure some are > still using that (like Mike K). > > mrg > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Oct 9, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>>> >>>> (1) continues to tick another as is, until I have time to spend on >>>> learning Apache CMS, navigating a bunch of obscure Perl, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>> As for old CAYDOC, I don't see why we'd want to delete old documentation. >>>> That is still useful. >>> >>> We have 4 versions of the documentation with the wiki process - (a) dynamic >>> on Wiki, (b) autoexported on wiki (cwiki.apache.org), (c) cloned from (b) >>> to our site, (d) - specially formatted version of (a) in SVN. My suggestion >>> is to remove (a) and (b) as we don't need them, but keep the (c) and (d). >> >> So a last chance to stop the deletion of these spaces... Planning to do it >> tomorrow. >> >> >
