On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
> No this hasn't been discussed yet. How would that work - does the entire PMC 
> shares a single password, or Twitter supports multiple users per account?

I have heard of other PMCs that they share a single account and the
password via private@ list. I think this would do the trick.

The accounts e-mail address is a bit more of a problem. Some people
don't like private@ as account email, because all the notifications
from twitter go to the ml. On the other hand, PMC can react easily
when using private@.

Btw, on comdev is currently a discussion on "how to get new
contributors" via twitter.

Cheers
Christian

>
> Andrus
>
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 7:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> Just out of curiosity (not reading private) - has a cayenne twitter
>> account been opened? is it discussed in private? Should/can I help
>> with it?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Besides the fact that the attention to Cayenne was attracted by the 
>>>> "favorable mention in online articles" kind of proves the point that 
>>>> marketing matters. If the project doesn't attempt to place itself on 
>>>> anyone's radar, there will be no online articles.
>>>>
>>>> And of course nobody denies the need for improvement of the code and docs, 
>>>> but that sort of goes without saying. While marketing requires us to pause 
>>>> and think of the strategy.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Actually reading from Cayenne on Twitter from time to time gives the
>>> impression this project is active. Same is true for regular blogposts.
>>> In addition, if I seen 10 posts on Cayenne and have no clue, I might
>>> get interested and read only one of them. Then I might decide to look
>>> at more, if I like it.
>>> Many blogposts also show that there is already community interest.
>>> This is crucial for many people, for example like me. I was kind of
>>> nervous before I decided to prefer Cayenne over Hibernate in my
>>> project, just because it was much more silent than Hibernate. Now I
>>> know better and I am glad, but not everybody has the chance to take
>>> such a "risk" (or want).
>>>
>>> I think good Javadocs are one side of a coin, a vibrant community is
>>> the other side. Both go hand in hand.
>>>
>>> Btw Jo - if I remember right, you have made a similar choice like I
>>> did in the past. Are you willing to share your experience? I might
>>> think this will make up a good blog post. If you don't run a blog, we
>>> can arrange some kind of an interview in my blog.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 8, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon Nov  7 23:01:18 2011, Durchholz, Joachim wrote:
>>>>>> Twitter and blogging won't help those who already use it, and those who 
>>>>>> don't use it yet won't want to spend their time reading regular updates. 
>>>>>> That said, it might be helpful for those who consider using it but 
>>>>>> haven't found the time or resolve to actually do it; but these will be 
>>>>>> more interested in what newbie Cayenne users have to say than in what 
>>>>>> the developers think is the newest and greatest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's important is to lower the entry barrier.
>>>>>> E.g. make Modeler intuitive to use and cover all aspects that could be 
>>>>>> reasonably modelled. (My experience, as just one data point: I toyed 
>>>>>> with it for half an afternoon and found it a bit hard to get a handle on 
>>>>>> it and on what features it actually supports. Another detail might be 
>>>>>> that the tool should announce itself with a phrase that allows people to 
>>>>>> decide what they can and can't expect it to do; for example, that it is 
>>>>>> not supposed to model everything that their database can, but everything 
>>>>>> that... well, no idea what exactly its area of expertise should be.)
>>>>>> The documentation is actually great as an overview. It touches 
>>>>>> everything one would ask when trying to determine what Cayenne can and 
>>>>>> cannot do. It is frugal with details though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My advice would be to get Cayenne ahead. That's going to gain more 
>>>>>> followers than trying to do anything marketing-wise - the marketing that 
>>>>>> led to my current interest in Cayenne wasn't twitter feeds or blog 
>>>>>> posts, it was favorable mention in online articles.
>>>>>> What's important is what Cayenne can and what it cannot (or will not) 
>>>>>> do. Example projects would be nice; have a web service and a J2SE 
>>>>>> application (one of each kind). Have the example projects touch every 
>>>>>> complication once: long-running transactions, distributed commits, proxy 
>>>>>> objects, optimistic update conflicts. In the famous words of Linus 
>>>>>> Torvalds: "Words are cheap. Show me the code." (I have been bitten too 
>>>>>> many times by believing some project's overhyped self description. I bet 
>>>>>> a lot of developers out there share the experience, particularly those 
>>>>>> who are in a position to advocate an architectural switch. Nothing that 
>>>>>> the developers could write will help overcome that scepticism; only 
>>>>>> working code will, and it won't convince, at best it will lower the 
>>>>>> barrier. I, for an example, still haven't committed to Cayenne; the 
>>>>>> kinds of problems that show up in the mailing list are currently making 
>>>>>> me a bit more sceptical. I'm simply not prepared to spend several 
>>>>>> person-months
>>>>> on an experiment that may fail, my time budget does not allow this 
>>>>> (unfortunately, I'd love to try Cayenne out).)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Jo
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jo
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your comments. I am not quite sure what to make of them all, 
>>>>> but perhaps a point of reference which would help us understand: what are 
>>>>> you comparing Cayenne to? Hibernate? Something else? No ORM at all?
>>>>>
>>>>> I ask, because promoting Cayenne seems to fall into two categories: 1. 
>>>>> Cayenne is a more suitable tool for the particular task than other ORMs, 
>>>>> 2. You'll want to this this ORM thing instead of putting SQL into your 
>>>>> code.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are quite different audiences for any messages we are trying to get 
>>>>> out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ari
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------------------------->
>>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>
>
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

Reply via email to