Hi, Currently the chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings Maven artifacts are: <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings</artifactId> There are actually two artifiacts built, with different classifier / type: -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.8.0-classes.jar (classifier "classes") -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.8.0.war (type "war")
Following the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-501, because classifiers make it difficult to find things, this is being changed to two different artifacts: <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes</artifactId> -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes-0.9.0.jar and <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes</artifactId> <packaging>war</packaging> -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.9.0.war I contend that this is actually backwards, and that it would be preferable to have the "normal" JAR (containg just classes) have a normal name. So I'd prefer if we had: <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings</artifactId> -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.9.0.jar and <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war</artifactId> <packaging>war</packaging> -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war-0.9.0.war Does anyone feel that this would be a problem? Florent -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
