Hi,
Looks like there are no objections. I'm going to rename the artifacts.
Florian
Hi,
Currently the chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings Maven artifacts are:
<groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
<artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings</artifactId>
There are actually two artifiacts built, with different classifier /
type:
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.8.0-classes.jar (classifier
"classes")
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.8.0.war (type "war")
Following the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CMIS-501,
because classifiers make it difficult to find things, this is being
changed
to two different artifacts:
<groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
<artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes</artifactId>
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes-0.9.0.jar
and
<groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
<artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-classes</artifactId>
<packaging>war</packaging>
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.9.0.war
I contend that this is actually backwards, and that it would be
preferable
to have the "normal" JAR (containg just classes) have a normal name.
So I'd
prefer if we had:
<groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
<artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings</artifactId>
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.9.0.jar
and
<groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId>
<artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war</artifactId>
<packaging>war</packaging>
-> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war-0.9.0.war
Does anyone feel that this would be a problem?
Florent
