Works for me. 0.9 requires many changes anyway. Michael
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Florent Guillaume <[email protected]> wrote: > > I contend that this is actually backwards, and that it would be preferable > to have the "normal" JAR (containg just classes) have a normal name. So I'd > prefer if we had: > <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> > <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings</artifactId> > -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-0.9.0.jar > and > <groupId>org.apache.chemistry.opencmis</groupId> > <artifactId>chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war</artifactId> > <packaging>war</packaging> > -> chemistry-opencmis-server-bindings-war-0.9.0.war > > Does anyone feel that this would be a problem? > > Florent > > > > > > -- > Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo > Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) > http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87 >
