Hi Lukas, I’m going to retract that statement, we have found some more occurrences of the issue in CMISFolder and a couple in CMISSession.
Please continue to hold off the release until tomorrow. Regards, Gavin On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:40, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix committed. > > Regards, > > Gavin > > > > On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Gavin, >> >> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :) >> >> Cheers, >> Lukas >> >> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Lukas, >>> >>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really good >>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release. >>> >>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release >>> until I’ve committed the fix? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gavin >>> >>> >>> >>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Gavin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit today. >>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Lukas >>>>> >>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a couple of >>>>>> minor >>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a progress >>>>>> issue). >>>>>> >>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project settings >>>>>> (when >>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode 5.0 so >>>>>> I’ve >>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being included in >>>>>> the >>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings I think >>>>>> we’re >>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gavin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before giving the green >>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you know as soon >>>>>>> as >>>>>>> I can. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything is ready for 0.3 >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding checkin >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>> let >>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the further approach >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here that there isn¹t >>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask is beck from holiday >>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if that¹s OK? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is absolutely fine with me >>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the branch over the >>>>>>>>> weekend >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that locally. There is >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial commit, but I >>>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should have something to >>>>>>>>> contribute soon. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However ACL write support is >>>>>>>>>> not on >>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather do a release now and >>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding. >>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please let me know how you want >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> proceed. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3 release without the browser >>>>>>>>>>> binding. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner than 3-4 months (most >>>>>>>>>>> likely >>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be able to work on the browser >>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish your ACL write >>>>>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4 release for the browser >>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target a 0.3 release without browser >>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding done first. From our side >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which we can get this done. If we >>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next 2 to 3 months I would prefer >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> bundle >>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3. If you think we need longer >>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding to 0.4. However we have a >>>>>>>>>>>> strong >>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore plan to have at least >>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic. >>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in our pipeline is write support >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs. >>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser for read support however write >>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also during the next weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would also be really useful for us >>>>>>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release sooner rather than later, what >>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there from your side that would need >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be more consistent to have only the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>> object >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will change our code to use the request >>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove the stop parameter from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> library. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google hangout in the past, however we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me know when you have setup the branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the timeframe for the upcoming >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective CMIS 0.3 release. We need >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible so that we can get an approval >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about the stop parameter being a common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally I would prefer that we remove it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach works. We then have one consistent way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the whole library (the parameter approach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods with progress). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're also interested in the browser binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while ago so I need to sync it with the recent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch as soon as I can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would be a great idea to resurrect the status >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once a month. I will schedule something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something. Can you remind me, are you guys able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex be a better choice? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
