Hi Gavin, I'm preparing the release right now. So this is the last call for anyone who want's to suspend the release…
Best regards, Lukas On 4/1/14 11:19 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Lukas, > >As you probably saw I committed the extra fixes last night so I think >we’re now all set for the 0.3 release. > >Regards, > >Gavin > > > >On 31 Mar 2014, at 17:03, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi Lukas, >> >> I’m going to retract that statement, we have found some more >>occurrences of the issue in CMISFolder and a couple in CMISSession. >> >> Please continue to hold off the release until tomorrow. >> >> Regards, >> >> Gavin >> >> >> >> On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:40, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> Hi Lukas, >>> >>> The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix >>>committed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Gavin >>> >>> >>> >>> On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Gavin, >>>> >>>> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Lukas >>>> >>>> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Lukas, >>>>> >>>>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really >>>>>good >>>>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release. >>>>> >>>>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release >>>>> until I’ve committed the fix? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gavin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell >>>>><[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gavin >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit >>>>>>>today. >>>>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a couple of >>>>>>>> minor >>>>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a progress >>>>>>>> issue). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project settings >>>>>>>> (when >>>>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode 5.0 so >>>>>>>> I’ve >>>>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being >>>>>>>>included in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings I >>>>>>>>think >>>>>>>> we’re >>>>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell >>>>>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before giving the >>>>>>>>>green >>>>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you know as >>>>>>>>>soon >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> I can. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything is ready for >>>>>>>>>>0.3 >>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding checkin >>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>> let >>>>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the further >>>>>>>>>>approach >>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here that there isn¹t >>>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask is beck from >>>>>>>>>>>holiday >>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if that¹s OK? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is absolutely fine >>>>>>>>>>>with me >>>>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the branch over the >>>>>>>>>>> weekend >>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that locally. There >>>>>>>>>>>is >>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial commit, but I >>>>>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should have >>>>>>>>>>>something to >>>>>>>>>>> contribute soon. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However ACL write support is >>>>>>>>>>>> not on >>>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather do a release now >>>>>>>>>>>>and >>>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding. >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please let me know how you >>>>>>>>>>>>want >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> proceed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3 release without the >>>>>>>>>>>>>browser >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner than 3-4 months >>>>>>>>>>>>>(most >>>>>>>>>>>>> likely >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be able to work on the >>>>>>>>>>>>>browser >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish your ACL write >>>>>>>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4 release for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>browser >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target a 0.3 release without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>browser >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding done first. From our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>side >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which we can get this done. If >>>>>>>>>>>>>>we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next 2 to 3 months I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>prefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle >>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3. If you think we need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>longer >>>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding to 0.4. However we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> strong >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore plan to have at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>least >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in our pipeline is write >>>>>>>>>>>>>>support >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser for read support however >>>>>>>>>>>>>>write >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also during the next weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would also be really useful for us >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release sooner rather than later, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there from your side that would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross, Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be more consistent to have only the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will change our code to use the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove the stop parameter from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google hangout in the past, however >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me know when you have setup the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the timeframe for the upcoming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective CMIS 0.3 release. We >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible so that we can get an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>approval >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about the stop parameter being a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally I would prefer that we remove >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach works. We then have one consistent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the whole library (the parameter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>approach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods with progress). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're also interested in the browser >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while ago so I need to sync it with the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>recent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch as soon as I can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would be a great idea to resurrect the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>status >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once a month. I will schedule something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something. Can you remind me, are you guys >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex be a better choice? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
