Hi Lukas, As you probably saw I committed the extra fixes last night so I think we’re now all set for the 0.3 release.
Regards, Gavin On 31 Mar 2014, at 17:03, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > I’m going to retract that statement, we have found some more occurrences of > the issue in CMISFolder and a couple in CMISSession. > > Please continue to hold off the release until tomorrow. > > Regards, > > Gavin > > > > On 31 Mar 2014, at 16:40, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Lukas, >> >> The issue with cancelling create operations is resolved and the fix >> committed. >> >> Regards, >> >> Gavin >> >> >> >> On 31 Mar 2014, at 15:48, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gavin, >>> >>> Sure - just drop me an email when you have fixed the issue :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Lukas >>> >>> On 3/31/14 3:51 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Lukas, >>>> >>>> I’ve found another bug (uploads do not cancel) that would be really good >>>> to be fixed before we do the 0.3 release. >>>> >>>> I’m testing a solution right now, can you please hold off the release >>>> until I’ve committed the fix? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Gavin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 08:29, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Sounds great, many thanks Lukas. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Gavin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 07:50, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have some minor fixes on our side that I'm going to commit today. >>>>>> I will take care of the 0.3 release next week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Lukas >>>>>> >>>>>> On 3/27/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have run through all the tests on our side and found a couple of >>>>>>> minor >>>>>>> issues that I addressed yesterday (project settings and a progress >>>>>>> issue). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is still an Xcode warning/suggestion on the project settings >>>>>>> (when >>>>>>> using Xcode 5.1) which caused a problem building with Xcode 5.0 so >>>>>>> I’ve >>>>>>> left them as they were for now. The 64 bit slice is being included in >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> binary so I think this will be fine for this release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unless you have a different opinion on the project settings I think >>>>>>> we’re >>>>>>> ready for the 0.3 release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 15:24, Gavin Cornwell <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There’s one more thing to check on our side before giving the green >>>>>>>> light for 0.3, I will work on that tomorrow and let you know as soon >>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> I can. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 25 Mar 2014, at 06:38, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alright then. Just give me you OK when everything is ready for 0.3 >>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>> your side. I will then do the release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whenever you are ready for the initial browser binding checkin >>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>> let >>>>>>>>> me know so that we can have a look and discuss the further approach >>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/24/14 11:14 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sounds good to me, I just need to check here that there isn¹t >>>>>>>>>> anything >>>>>>>>>> else required for 0.3, the guy I need to ask is beck from holiday >>>>>>>>>> tomorrow so I¹ll send a response tomorrow if that¹s OK? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If you don¹t mind doing the release that is absolutely fine with me >>>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the browser binding, I created the branch over the >>>>>>>>>> weekend >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> have merged the work I did previously into that locally. There is >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> some work to do before I¹m happy doing an initial commit, but I >>>>>>>>>> plan >>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>> doing that in the evenings this week so I should have something to >>>>>>>>>> contribute soon. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 21 Mar 2014, at 16:46, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Excellent thats also our opinion. However ACL write support is >>>>>>>>>>> not on >>>>>>>>>>> our >>>>>>>>>>> list for the next weeks, so I would rather do a release now and >>>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on Browser Binding. >>>>>>>>>>> Do you want me to do the release? Please let me know how you want >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> proceed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/21/14 12:29 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think yes, we should target the 0.3 release without the browser >>>>>>>>>>>> binding. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will probably need a 0.3 release sooner than 3-4 months (most >>>>>>>>>>>> likely >>>>>>>>>>>> in the next month) and I will only be able to work on the browser >>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>> as a background task in my spare time. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My preference therefore would be to finish your ACL write >>>>>>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> release that as 0.3 and then have a 0.4 release for the browser >>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>> support. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 13:01, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The main question is: Do we target a 0.3 release without browser >>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>> or do we plan to get browser binding done first. From our side >>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> depends on the timeframe in which we can get this done. If we >>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>> this done within lets say the next 2 to 3 months I would prefer >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle >>>>>>>>>>>>> everything together and release 0.3. If you think we need longer >>>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>> should consider moving browser binding to 0.4. However we have a >>>>>>>>>>>>> strong >>>>>>>>>>>>> demand for browser binding and therefore plan to have at least >>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>> person >>>>>>>>>>>>> working full-time on this topic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> The only other thing currently in our pipeline is write support >>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> ACLs. >>>>>>>>>>>>> We recently committed the parser for read support however write >>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>> missing. We plan to do this also during the next weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/20/14 10:27 AM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent, a 0.3 release would also be really useful for us >>>>>>>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would suggest doing a release sooner rather than later, what >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation tasks are there from your side that would need >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> done >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before 0.3? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gav >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Mar 2014, at 07:58, Gross, Lukas <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be more consistent to have only the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> object >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cancel a request. I will change our code to use the request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel method and then remove the stop parameter from the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> library. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had problems using Google hangout in the past, however we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another try. Just let me know when you have setup the branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schedule a session. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also discuss the timeframe for the upcoming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so that we can plan the Objective CMIS 0.3 release. We need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release as early as possible so that we can get an approval >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lukas >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/19/14 10:21 PM, "Gavin Cornwell" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see your point about the stop parameter being a common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paradigm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iOS, however, personally I would prefer that we remove it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the request approach works. We then have one consistent way >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cancel >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations across the whole library (the parameter approach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable to methods with progress). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great to hear you're also interested in the browser binding. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> initial work a while ago so I need to sync it with the recent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll commit it in a branch as soon as I can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I too think it would be a great idea to resurrect the status >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meeting, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even if it's just once a month. I will schedule something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed something. Can you remind me, are you guys able to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hangouts or would webex be a better choice? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gavin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
