+1 for having pubsub, but the current site folder from which the site is generated should be moved to git (and can be part of the reactor)
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all > > As commented in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5930 > we need to convert our website to be based on svnpubsub or Apache CMS. > You can find info about Apache CMS at http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html > and Apache project web site management at > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html > > I suggest to base our web site on svnpubsub. I think its setup will be > easier since > we already have our site folder on svn. Please correct me if I am wrong. > Note that in case of moving to GIT we need to keep site folder on svn for > this. > > Please vote on using svnpubsub: > +1 yes. > +0 not sure > -1 no, because ... > > Vote is open for next 72 hours. > > Regards > Hasan >
