+1 Tommaso
2013/3/7 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > +1 for having pubsub, but the current site folder from which the site is > generated should be moved to git (and can be part of the reactor) > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear all > > > > As commented in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5930 > > we need to convert our website to be based on svnpubsub or Apache CMS. > > You can find info about Apache CMS at http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html > > and Apache project web site management at > > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html > > > > I suggest to base our web site on svnpubsub. I think its setup will be > > easier since > > we already have our site folder on svn. Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Note that in case of moving to GIT we need to keep site folder on svn for > > this. > > > > Please vote on using svnpubsub: > > +1 yes. > > +0 not sure > > -1 no, because ... > > > > Vote is open for next 72 hours. > > > > Regards > > Hasan > > >
