+1 On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Tommaso > > > 2013/3/7 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > >> +1 for having pubsub, but the current site folder from which the site is >> generated should be moved to git (and can be part of the reactor) >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Hasan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Dear all >> > >> > As commented in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5930 >> > we need to convert our website to be based on svnpubsub or Apache CMS. >> > You can find info about Apache CMS at http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html >> > and Apache project web site management at >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html >> > >> > I suggest to base our web site on svnpubsub. I think its setup will be >> > easier since >> > we already have our site folder on svn. Please correct me if I am wrong. >> > Note that in case of moving to GIT we need to keep site folder on svn for >> > this. >> > >> > Please vote on using svnpubsub: >> > +1 yes. >> > +0 not sure >> > -1 no, because ... >> > >> > Vote is open for next 72 hours. >> > >> > Regards >> > Hasan >> > >>
-- | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen
