That's very simple. Perfect ;)
Kind regards, Mikhail Четверг, 19 сентября 2013, 12:24 -04:00 от Jim Jagielski <[email protected]>: >Fully-baked ? >Achieved ? >Completed ? >Legacy-mode ? > >On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Sally Khudairi < [email protected] > wrote: > >> <peanutgallery> >> >> "Napping" immediately came to mind when reading Jim's note <g> >> >> I agree wrt "dormant"; although it is exactly what we're talking about, it >> insinuates something negative. "Ripe" is hilarious. >> >> How about something along the lines of "holding" or "at rest"? >> >> </peanutgallery> >> >> >> - Sally >> >> >> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: "[email protected]" < [email protected] > >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: Ingie < [email protected] >; [email protected] >>> Sent: Thursday, 19 September 2013, 11:07 >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retirement into the Attic >>> >>> >>> I like this idea, especially the relaxing of the reporting schedule. >>> >>> But I worry about the connotation of "dormant". Perhaps "mature", >>> "sustaining", "stable", "steady-state", "lasting"? >>> >>> "Ripe"? ^_^ >>> >>> --k >>> >>> On 2013.Sep.19, at 7.16a, Jim Jagielski < [email protected] > wrote: >>> >>>> This is a good point. Sometimes projects are just done, and >>>> retiring them to the Attic does portray a project that >>>> is no longer relevant or used or useful. Nor will people >>>> pick up and start using projects in the Attic. >>>> >>>> Maybe we need some other classification of project, like >>>> 'Dormant'. These would be projects that could obtain the >>>> required 3 developers and votes, but basically are >>>> just done; their reporting could be every 6 months, etc... >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Ingie < [email protected] > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Chris, >>>>> >>>>> I use Click for several apps for years. I started with 2.3.0 and now I >>>>> use.... hm..... 2.3.0 ;) >>>>> >>>>> There are number of reasons that makes this project different. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Not so many bugfixes as usual. Because it's JUST WORKS. Apps based on >>>>> Click are very stable. >>>>> 2. Lack of activity in discussions, no documentation updates, no new >>>>> examples. Because it's REALLY SIMPLE. Look at Cheat Sheet pdf. It's the >>>>> only documentation I read years ago. And that's enough. >>>>> 3. No releases. Because it's PERFECT. It's minimal stateless framework >>>>> for developers who needs minimal stateless framework. >>>>> >>>>> From the other side. >>>>> It's really no difference for me, for example, is the project retired or >>>>> not. (Sorry) Because framework is perfect and just works. Next project I >>>>> will start I will use Click. I will not go to Apache site for newest >>>>> version. I will not use Wicket, for example. I already have one, that >>>>> fits my needs. So, I think Attic is not the place for Click. Attic is the >>>>> place for projects with no future. Click is the project with no further >>>>> development. Maybe it's different things. For the first 2-5 years. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Mikhail Peresypkin >>>>> >>>>> Среда, 18 сентября 2013, 11:00 -07:00 от Chris Mattmann < >>>>> [email protected] >: >>>>> Dear Apache Click PMC, >>>>> >>>>> Based on your board report for September 2013, I'm >>>>> starting a thread here on the dev list for retirement >>>>> of Apache Click. >>>>> >>>>> If you have any opinions, for or against retirement, >>>>> please make them known. If discussion doesn't really >>>>> urge against retirement in the next week I'll call >>>>> an official [VOTE] thread with resolution to retire >>>>> the project to the Attic. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for your attention to this matter. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Chris >>>>> (on behalf of the Apache Board) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
