Lewis, Thanks, for the diligent checking below and in your other email.
I'm already in for another RC. However since I'm going on vacation and I think some of the below may take some investigation/vetting it would be great to get some help to resolve these DRAT issues. Is this something you could work? Thanks, Paul Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 30, 2014, at 2:33 AM, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > with the following results for DRAT > > Notes Binaries Archives Standards Apache Generated Unknown 0 0 0 110 23 0 > 87 > I have shipped the results of DRAT to my personal space on minotur and they > can be found here folks... > > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/climate/0.4/ > > There are some ones we need to consider possibly? > > There are AFAICT 3 +1's... I am certainly not giving any blockers here... > however I think we have work to do. > > @pramirez, as release manager, it's up you you right now. I have not VOTE'd. > > If you feel based on a review of my comments that it is OK to release then > by all means go. I would please arge you to wait and consider some of my > points however. > Thanks again for puttign OCW 0.4 together. Brilliant. > Lewis > > > > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thank you Paul for running with this. >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release >>> Hi Folks, >>> >>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. The >>> source code is at: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ >> >> Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about this >> is is merely an observation. >> >> **my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment >> >> >>> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Process >> >> We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise you >> here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. We >> can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker. >> >> >>> >>> The release was made from (commit >>> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at: >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git >> >> I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag within >> git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release! >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags >> Is this required? >> I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to >> should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable' >> release in the future. >> If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience. >> >> OK lets move on, >> >> CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1] >> >> [0] http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&version=12325041 >> >> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls >> KEYS-0.4 climate-0.4-rc1.zip climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc >> climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1 >> >> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4 >> gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) < >> [email protected]>" imported >> gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < >> [email protected]>" imported >> gpg: Total number processed: 2 >> gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 2) >> >> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify >> climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc >> gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 2C47D568 >> gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < >> [email protected]>" >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! >> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the >> owner. >> Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990 4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 D568 >> >> lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip >> MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1 >> >> ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great. >> >> OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory >> >> CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC) >> @Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within >> NOTICE >> This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin >> (ycopin on Github). For details please see: >> https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888 >> https://github.com/ycopin >> http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/ >> >> This makes life and day. >> >> The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not blocker by any >> means. >> >> Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a >> blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making >> documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1. >> >> I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No >> problems it would seem. >> I believe we should really address this however within the README.md. >> >> >>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is >>> open for the next 72 hours. >>> >>> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to >>> check the >>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes >>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >>> >>> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 >> >> >> I've run DRAT on the release candidate > > > > -- > *Lewis*
