Thanks for checking all this Lewis. I'll be sure to help you get some of these issues resolved this weekend/upcoming week (although it looks like you made some great headway already with CLIMATE-500).
I think I had a ticket open for resolving some of these license issues as well. I'll see if I can find it and link it to the issue. I'll also go through and cleanup any of the frontend stuff that is missing headers. I know I made that worse when I began the transition over to the "new" frontend since I copy/pasted a large amount of files from the old UI and haven't updated the others. -- Joyce On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < [email protected]> wrote: > Feel free to use my apachestuff scripts for release verification: > > https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff/ > > Cheers, > Chris > > P.S. Thanks Lewis > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Chief Architect > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:20 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release > > >Thank you Paul for running with this. > > > >On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> > >wrote: > > > >> > >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. > >>The > >> source code is at: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ > >> > > > >Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about this > >is > >is merely an observation. > > > >**my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Proc > >>ess > >> > > > >We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise you > >here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. We > >can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker. > > > > > >> > >> The release was made from (commit > >> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at: > >> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git > >> > > > >I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag within > >git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release! > >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags > >Is this required? > >I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to > >should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable' > >release in the future. > >If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience. > > > >OK lets move on, > > > >CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1] > > > >[0] http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt > >[1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&; > >version=12325041 > > > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls > >KEYS-0.4 climate-0.4-rc1.zip climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > > climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1 > > > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4 > >gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) < > >[email protected]>" imported > >gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > >[email protected]>" imported > >gpg: Total number processed: 2 > >gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 2) > > > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify > >climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > >gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 2C47D568 > >gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < > >[email protected]>" > >gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > >gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > >owner. > >Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990 4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 > >D568 > > > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip > >MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1 > > > >ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great. > > > >OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory > > > >CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC) > >@Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within > >NOTICE > >This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin > >(ycopin on Github). For details please see: > > https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888 > > https://github.com/ycopin > > http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/ > > > >This makes life and day. > > > >The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not blocker by any > >means. > > > >Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a > >blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making > >documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1. > > > >I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No > >problems it would seem. > >I believe we should really address this however within the README.md. > > > > > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is > >> open for the next 72 hours. > >> > >> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to > >>check > >> the > >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote > >>passes > >> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >> > >> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 > > > > > >I've run DRAT on the release candidate > >
