Feel free to use my apachestuff scripts for release verification: https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff/
Cheers, Chris P.S. Thanks Lewis ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 2:20 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release >Thank you Paul for running with this. > >On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache OCW 0.4 Release >> Hi Folks, >> >> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OCW 0.4 release. >>The >> source code is at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/ >> > >Thanks for this? Do we only release .zip**? I am not bothered about this >is >is merely an observation. > >**my opinion based on users outside of vagrant or dev environment > > >> >> >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLIMATE/Software+Release+Proc >>ess >> > >We need to update this process based upon Git process. I REALLY praise you >here for pushing a candidate based upon a process which requires work. We >can work to make this better. It is NOWEHRE like a blocker. > > >> >> The release was made from (commit >> 1c8631ce0ba51e8f1839d009cae4fdf5280f8ab1) at: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/climate.git >> > >I really think that the releae procedure needs to accomodate a tag within >git. AFAICT we currently have no tag for this release! >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=climate.git;a=tags >Is this required? >I would this so... it gives us a good mechanism for reverting back to >should we require it. Or should some other person require a 'stable' >release in the future. >If you have a tag elsewhere Paul I am sorry for the inconvenience. > >OK lets move on, > >CHANGES.txt [0] looks perfect as per JIRA report [1] > >[0] http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-ocw-0.4/rc1/CHANGES-0.4.txt >[1] >https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314422&; >version=12325041 > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ ls >KEYS-0.4 climate-0.4-rc1.zip climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc > climate-0.4-rc1.zip.md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip.sha1 > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --import KEYS-0.4 >gpg: key 58EBE86D: public key "Cameron Goodale (FOR CODE SIGNING) < >[email protected]>" imported >gpg: key 2C47D568: public key "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < >[email protected]>" imported >gpg: Total number processed: 2 >gpg: imported: 2 (RSA: 2) > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ gpg --verify >climate-0.4-rc1.zip.asc >gpg: Signature made Thu Jul 24 16:42:43 2014 EDT using RSA key ID 2C47D568 >gpg: Good signature from "Paul Michael Ramirez (CODE SIGNING KEY) < >[email protected]>" >gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! >gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the >owner. >Primary key fingerprint: FA78 6E77 5FF1 0023 D990 4D13 A5DB C018 2C47 >D568 > >lmcgibbn@LMC-032857 ~/Downloads/climate $ md5 climate-0.4-rc1.zip >MD5 (climate-0.4-rc1.zip) = db25d3ac77fee19bfb42a156b71d62c1 > >ALL Perfect. Looks great to me. Check out great. > >OK so when I extract the .zip into my local directory > >CHANGES, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE are all flawless (AFAIC) >@Michael Joyce, thank you SO much for attributing the following within >NOTICE >This product includes work released as public domain by Yannick Copin >(ycopin on Github). For details please see: > https://gist.github.com/ycopin/3342888 > https://github.com/ycopin > http://snovae.in2p3.fr/ycopin/ > >This makes life and day. > >The DOAP has not been updated, but this is certianly not blocker by any >means. > >Imagine I dodn't know how to build the docs (e.g. new user) it is not a >blocker IMHO by any means.I think we can log a ticket for making >documentation navigation much more simple. This would be a HUGE +1. > >I ran (based on learning from you guys) the tests I could... passed. No >problems it would seem. >I believe we should really address this however within the README.md. > > >> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OCW 0.4. The vote is >> open for the next 72 hours. >> >> Only votes from Apache OCW PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to >>check >> the >> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote >>passes >> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >> >> [X] +1 Release the packages as Apache OCW 0.4 > > >I've run DRAT on the release candidate
