Github user kwhitehall commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/climate/pull/154#issuecomment-78356976
Yip @MJJoyce that was my suggestion w.r.t. the examples-esque folder or
apps-esque folder, and I think this thread drives that home.
So I gather that:
1. we all agree RCMES is an app of OCW and the RCMES-cli should go into the
repo as is, in its own folder or something (hence a discussion of the repo
structure is necessary)
2. OCW-cli should be updated to ensure that it is not broken
I am still on the fence w.r.t. simply rebranding the RCMES-cli to OCW-cli
to accommodate 2 above. Firstly, if we decide to go this way for this PR, we
don't want to set precedence. After all, if we all agree the workflow and
functionality of the RCMES-cli is ONE application of using the OCW libraries
then (1) Do we want the OCW-cli to demonstrate only that workflow? (2) Also,
should we then consider the OCW-cli to be an example of how to use OCW (i.e.
place it in the examples folder) if RCMES-cli is considered an app of it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
