To repeat what was discussed earlier in the thread: the cloud templates provided by Ubuntu and CentOS do not work because they expect the metadata URL to be at http://169.254.269.254/. Well, they work, but they take awfully long to time out and after they time out, you still wouldn't be able to login since they do not install the ssh keys.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > Op 28 februari 2017 om 2:40 schreef Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org > >: > > > > > > hi! > > > > I think we should work with distro provider to have their cloud builds > work > > with cloudstack. Good example is CoreOS, it work out of the box from > their > > channel builds. > > it shouldn't be too complicated to have centos, ubuntu and debian, unless > > ... > > I fully agree. I think that we shouldn't bother about VM templates. CentOS > and Ubuntu both have a proper template which we can include. > > The less we host as a project, the better. > > Keep in mind that we host a Open Source project. the RPM and DEB packages > on cloudstack.apt-get.eu are a service, but we release source as a > project. > > Wido > > > > > For our systemvm templates, can we just change the URL for somthing like > > cloudstack.apache.org/systemvm/... ? > > and for old systemvm that are depricated but that we might want to keep, > > could we archive them into a github repo in > > https://github.com/apachecloudstack ? > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <chirade...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > My stance is that the current workflow does a disservice to the user > > > community by letting them install / use outdated and insecure > templates. > > > Now, let's assume download.cloud.com is gone forever. What do we tell > ACS > > > users pre-4.11 as far as *built-in templates* go? > > > 1. Direct them to update templates.sql with some new URL, but with the > same > > > dirty old templates > > > 2. Direct them to update templates.sql with some new URL, but with nice > > > templates (e.g., open.vm.eu) > > > 3. Same as (2), but document more choices. > > > > > > Now, why should things be different for 4.11 and later? Documenting the > > > steps to install templates offline is trivial (and can be scripted to a > > > large part, like cloud-install-sys-tmplt) > > > > > > For pre-4.11 users, for *systemvms*, anyway we tell them to use > > > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu which is not controlled by ACS. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Agree with you. > > > > We need to support the current working flow. And then, define the > first > > > > version that will start using the new approach. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think we almost need a two pronged approach. > > > > > > > > > > 1) Get a solution in place which will enable us to document and > serve > > > > > templates for legacy systems. I will work on this. > > > > > 2) Discuss and understand how we SHOULD be handling this problem > in the > > > > > future and in what release we can expect it. > > > > > > > > > > I think we need to do both. I think we should start to try to > really > > > > > understand what we want to deliver in (2) going forward. > > > > > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > My worry is exactly with system VMs templates. > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, we indicate administrators to download them from > > > > > > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.6/ [1]. However, the > > > > > installation > > > > > > docs do not mention the expected hashes for the file that is > going to > > > > be > > > > > > downloaded. > > > > > > Also, I do not know the code that downloads system VMs templates > > > (when > > > > > > upgrading), but if the hash being checked is taken from the > mirror > > > used > > > > > to > > > > > > download the file; the only thing it checks is that if the > download > > > > > > finished successfully (no transmission errors). If we want to > check > > > > > > integrity, check that the template we created is untampered; we > need > > > to > > > > > > host and serve the hash in a secure manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack- > > > > > installation/en/4.9/ > > > > > > management-server/index.html#prepare-the-system-vm-template > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > > > > chirade...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hashes are checked (md5 IIRC) today. > > > > > > > But given the issues, I think the project should steer away > from > > > > > hosting > > > > > > > templates except the systemvm template. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Rafael Weingärtner < > > > > > > > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will, I think we could support different path structures. > This > > > can > > > > > > > > facilitate different deployment of mirrors based on the > structure > > > > the > > > > > > > host > > > > > > > > has. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could I add something else to the discussion? Have we > discussed > > > the > > > > > > > > security impacts of setting up this mirrors approach? > > > > > > > > I mean, if any of the mirrors gets corrupted (let`s say by a > > > > hacker), > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > the templates are injected with malicious code, an attacker > could > > > > > > > > potentially get un-monitored and unlimited access to a cloud > > > > > > environment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we assume that the mirror may get malicious (it is not > that I > > > do > > > > > not > > > > > > > > trust you guys, but bad things happen), we cannot host hashes > > > > there. > > > > > > > Where > > > > > > > > do you think we could store Sha512 or another hash type for > these > > > > > > > > templates? Could we host in the newly proposed Github repo or > > > maybe > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > place in the ACS website? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would have an impact on clients (needing clear > > > documentation) > > > > > and > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > code that automatically downloads System VM templates (does > it > > > > check > > > > > > > hashes > > > > > > > > when automatically installing templates today? It may require > > > > > > > > implementation changes). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Will Stevens < > > > > wstev...@cloudops.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so this is what I am looking to do. Please let me know if > you > > > > have > > > > > > > > > suggestions for me or think I should be solving the > problem a > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - We request a new Github repository from the ASF at: > > > > > > > > > 'apache/cloudstack-mirror-list' > > > > > > > > > - In this repository we track a text file in the 'gh-pages' > > > > branch > > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > > > list of valid download mirrors. > > > > > > > > > - I build a binary to be hosted by the ASF (or at least > with > > > the > > > > > ASF > > > > > > > > > pointing a domain at the binary and I could potentially > host > > > it). > > > > > We > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > see how they want to handle the hosting of the binary. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The binary would expose a web server which would behave as > > > > follows: > > > > > > > > > - When the 'client' requests a download url the following > flow > > > is > > > > > > > kicked > > > > > > > > > off: > > > > > > > > > -- The mirror list is queried from github (or from a static > > > site > > > > > > hosted > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > asf, as we see fit). > > > > > > > > > -- The Lat/Lon of the 'client' is determined based on > their IP. > > > > > > > > > -- The Lat/Lon for each of the 'mirror's is determined > based on > > > > an > > > > > IP > > > > > > > > > lookup of the hostname. > > > > > > > > > -- The closest geographical mirror is determined, the > target is > > > > > > > validated > > > > > > > > > to be available and the user is redirected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some questions I have right now: > > > > > > > > > - Will every mirror have the same path structure to access > the > > > > > > > equivalent > > > > > > > > > resources? > > > > > > > > > - Should we support adding a path to the mirror url to > specify > > > > the > > > > > > path > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > the base common path? > > > > > > > > > -- Example: lets say the binary is hosted on 'dl.acs.com' > and > > > > > there > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > three mirrors 'abc.com', 'pqr.com/files' and ' > > > xyx.com/downloads > > > > '. > > > > > > > > > -- If the path being requested is ' > > > > > > > > > dl.acs.com/templates/systemvm-4.6.xen.vhd.bz2', it would > > > result > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > following potential paths for the mirrors: > > > > > > > > > -- 'abc.com/templates/systemvm-4.6.xen.vhd.bz2' > > > > > > > > > -- 'pqr.com/files/templates/systemvm-4.6.xen.vhd.bz2' > > > > > > > > > -- 'xyz.com/downloads/templates/systemvm-4.6.xen.vhd.bz2' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does this all make sense? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > > > > > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < > > > > > > > chirade...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My bad. A few lines down, this has been added recently: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this.request.setFollowRedirects(true); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Will Stevens < > > > > > > > > williamstev...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK. Thanks for the heads up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 27, 2017 1:08 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" < > > > > > > chirade...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds workable. The downloader code in the SSVM > won't > > > > follow > > > > > > > > > > redirects I > > > > > > > > > > > > think. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/ > > > > > > > > > > 5511065fc20787619d9cd0444a65a3 > > > > > > > > > > > > 155fc9c921/core/src/com/cloud/storage/template/ > > > > > > > > > > > > HttpTemplateDownloader.java#L93 > > > > > > > > > > > > https://goo.gl/dSi0r5 > > > > > > > > > > > > Might need to add > > > > > > > > > > > > client.setRedirectStrategy(new > LaxRedirectStrategy()); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Will Stevens < > > > > > > > > wstev...@cloudops.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We haven't opened a ticket yet because we don't > have a > > > > > > strategy > > > > > > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you guys think of this: > > > > > > > > > > > > > - We setup a new github repo in the 'apache' org > which > > > > > > consists > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > single > > > > > > > > > > > > > file with a list of active/supported mirrors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - I write a small web server, distributed as a > binary, > > > > > which > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > hosted > > > > > > > > > > > > > by ASF Infra. This web server will query the > current > > > > list > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > mirrors > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > will select one and then do a 302 redirect to that > > > > mirror. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The act of 'choosing' a mirror could be done in a > > > number > > > > of > > > > > > > ways. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - If we want to define an order, then it could > just try > > > > > from > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > top > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > list and work its way down. It would curl the > target > > > to > > > > > make > > > > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > > > > > > a 200 and if it does, it would do a 302 redirect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Or, if we want to distribute the load across the > > > > mirrors, > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > could > > > > > > > > > > > pick > > > > > > > > > > > > > from the list randomly. Again, doing a curl to > verify > > > > the > > > > > > > mirror > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > then doing a redirect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - If we want to get fancy, we could do a reverse IP > > > > lookup > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > try > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > match > > > > > > > > > > > > > the requester with their closest geographical > mirror. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > < > > > > > > > > > > > chirade...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What steps are needed to set up a mirror? What > does > > > > Infra > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > do? > > > > > > > > > > > > Has > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anybody filed a ticket with Infra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Raja Pullela < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raja.pull...@accelerite.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi will, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe, we didn’t get to close ‘getting a > mirror > > > > on > > > > > > > > Apache’ > > > > > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > needed someone on the Apache Infra side to > close > > > > this. > > > > > > BTW, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cloudstack-apt.get.eu (I think Nux manages > this?) > > > > has > > > > > > > > all/most > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > content. Once we can close on the Apache > mirror > > > for > > > > > > > hosting > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > content, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > can help assist getting the content there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, we have replicated the > download.cloud.com > > > > > > content > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > ‘ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > s3.download.accelerite.com’. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, we are working on a set of > steps/procedure to > > > > > help > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > change. I will update everyone in about a > week’s > > > > time > > > > > on > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > details. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Raja Pullela > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Engineering Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Accelerite, 2055 Laurelwood Road, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Santa Clara, CA, 95054 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/24/17, 11:23 PM, " > williamstev...@gmail.com on > > > > > > behalf > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > Will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stevens" <williamstev...@gmail.com on behalf > of > > > > > > > > > > > > wstev...@cloudops.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unfortunately the template mirror conversation > got > > > > > caught > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > details > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nobody took the lead on implementing a > solution. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > citrix has been pinging me every couple months > to > > > say > > > > > > > 'dude, > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > remove the dependency on download.citrix.com', > > > but i > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > had > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cycles to get in and solve the problem. the > > > shutdown > > > > > of > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > imminent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > right now, so we need to solve it asap. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Paul Angus < > > > > > > > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Nathan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ideally, if you put the template location in > (or > > > > use > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > template > > > > > > > > > > > > > defined > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in) test_data.py then the actual location > can be > > > > > > > > overridden > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > testing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Trillian, we've copied all of the > templates > > > > that > > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > define > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a local repo and then replace the URLs in > > > > > test_data.py > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > reduce > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bandwidth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > use and download times. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ie: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "bootableIso": > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "displaytext": "Test > Bootable > > > > > ISO", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "name": "testISO", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "bootable": True, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "ispublic": False, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "url": "{{ > > > > marvin_images_location > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }}/TinyCore-current.iso", > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "ostype": 'Other Linux > > > > (64-bit)', > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "mode": 'HTTP_DOWNLOAD' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought that we had come up with a > solution for > > > > > > > > > > > > download.cloud.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having a mirrorlist hosted in Community > Apache > > > > > 'space' > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > > anyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > able > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > out themselves forward as a mirror. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I must admit I lost track of whether > anyone > > > > made > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > requisite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in code.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Angus > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > www.shapeblue.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N > > > 4HSUK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto: > > > > > > > > williamstevens@gmail. > > > > > > > > > > com] > > > > > > > > > > > > On > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of Will Stevens > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: 24 February 2017 16:30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Modern template hosting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this is a hard questions. in general, we > should > > > be > > > > > > > setting > > > > > > > > > up > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > mirror > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > some cloudstack/apache domain and then > mirror to > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > provided > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > templates. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > we MUST come up with a solution to deprecate > ' > > > > > > > > > > download.cloud.com > > > > > > > > > > > ', > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is going to be going away any day now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i don't know the right way to solve this to > be > > > > > honest, > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > if > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ideas, i am willing to help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lead Developer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Nathan > Johnson > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > njohn...@ena.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So not to re-open a can of worms, but I’m > in a > > > > > > > situation > > > > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to come up with a Marvin component test > that > > > > > depends > > > > > > > on a > > > > > > > > > > > > template > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > based on a kernel that’s relatively new, > i.e., > > > > > newer > > > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > Centos > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.3 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ubuntu 10.04 . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see openvm.eu has a suitable template > > > (Ubuntu > > > > > > 16.0.4 > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > KVM), > > > > > > > > > > > > > but > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from looking at the thread "Migrating > > > CloudStack > > > > > > > content > > > > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > download.cloud.com” it looks like there is > > > > > > resistance > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > using > > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > least for hosting system vm templates over > > > > concerns > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > neutrality. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would this be suitable for a component > test? > > > If > > > > > not, > > > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > “blessed” > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > template location? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nathan Johnson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > R&D Engineer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 618 Grassmere Park Drive, Suite 12 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nashville, TN 37211 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > General Office: 615-312-6000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > website | blog | support > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ========== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail may contain privileged and > confidential > > > > > > > > information > > > > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the property of Accelerite, a Persistent > Systems > > > > > > business. > > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > intended > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only for the use of the individual or entity to > > > which > > > > > it > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > addressed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are not the intended recipient, you are not > > > > > > authorized > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > read, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > retain, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > copy, print, distribute or use this message. > If you > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > received > > > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > communication in error, please notify the > sender > > > and > > > > > > delete > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > copies > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems > > > > business > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > accept > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > liability for virus infected mails. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Rafael Weingärtner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Rafael Weingärtner > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Rafael Weingärtner > > > > > > > >
