So we manage static routes within our middleware and UI (we don't use the ACS native UI), so I don't think we've experienced this.
________________________________ From: williamstev...@gmail.com <williamstev...@gmail.com> on behalf of Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:26 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Private gateways - experience, anyone really using it ? @sweller: I would be interested in the PG fixes you have done. Anything related to overlapping routes? *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> CloudOps | Managed Private Cloud | Managed Public Cloud | Cloud Building | Cloud Architecture | Cloud Migration<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> goo.gl We provide private, public and hybrid cloud solutions for businesses seeking to scale, and for enterprises making their move to the Cloud. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > We use private gateways extensively with KVM and redundant VRs. We have > our own ACS 4.8 branch (https://github.com/myENA/ > cloudstack/tree/release/ENA-4.8) with quite a number of backported fixes > that relate to PGs. > > As far as I'm aware, vxlan is not supported on PGs today. We would like to > see it though. Today we use vlans and connect a customer lan to a PG via > MPLS. > > > ________________________________ > From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:09 AM > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Private gateways - experience, anyone really using it ? > > Hi all, > > I'm interested to know if anyone is using private gatewyas in production, > and what are your experience with it, any undocumented limitations, etc ? > > I dont see iif t supports vxlans (perhaps will try to test it myself) > > I really would appreciate any feedback. > > Thanks, > > -- > > Andrija Panić >
