Thanks everyone for swift comments :) I see (in ACS 4.5 ATM, to be soon upgraded to 4.8) there are some issues when creating (additional) physical networks (with CM), i.e. we set isolation method to be VLAN, but DB field is not written to at all, so when adding PV GTW, ACS fails back to add vlan interface on top of completely another physical interface because of this problem (now fixing manually in DB). Hope I will have PV GTW working, once I resolve this...
thx again On 3 May 2017 at 17:39, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Interesting. I wonder if the limitations we are seeing are actually a UI > artifact and not actually an implementation artifact. I will have to look > into that. Thanks... :) > > *Will STEVENS* > Lead Developer > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > > > So we manage static routes within our middleware and UI (we don't use the > > ACS native UI), so I don't think we've experienced this. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: williamstev...@gmail.com <williamstev...@gmail.com> on behalf of > > Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:26 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Private gateways - experience, anyone really using it ? > > > > @sweller: I would be interested in the PG fixes you have done. Anything > > related to overlapping routes? > > > > *Will STEVENS* > > Lead Developer > > > > <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > CloudOps | Managed Private Cloud | Managed Public Cloud | Cloud Building > | > > Cloud Architecture | Cloud Migration<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> > > goo.gl > > We provide private, public and hybrid cloud solutions for businesses > > seeking to scale, and for enterprises making their move to the Cloud. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > > > > > We use private gateways extensively with KVM and redundant VRs. We have > > > our own ACS 4.8 branch (https://github.com/myENA/ > > > cloudstack/tree/release/ENA-4.8) with quite a number of backported > fixes > > > that relate to PGs. > > > > > > As far as I'm aware, vxlan is not supported on PGs today. We would like > > to > > > see it though. Today we use vlans and connect a customer lan to a PG > via > > > MPLS. > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 10:09 AM > > > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Private gateways - experience, anyone really using it ? > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm interested to know if anyone is using private gatewyas in > production, > > > and what are your experience with it, any undocumented limitations, > etc ? > > > > > > I dont see iif t supports vxlans (perhaps will try to test it myself) > > > > > > I really would appreciate any feedback. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Andrija Panić > > > > > > -- Andrija Panić
