Ivan, I was composing an answer but i think we agree: Only if that functionality worked in the past. ipv6 support is still rather new and must be considered experimental. I think we should fix it in a maintenance release and not block the release for it. If it was working before and broke, it should go in. To put it less mildly, I expect more then ACS can deliver and we can't wait until all my wishes are implemented.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> wrote: > Sorry, to clarify, I mean (if I correctly understand) that if someone has > a network with several CIDRs in the basic zone and, lets say, 4.9.3 > upgraded to 4.11, which results that VMs stop getting DHCP announces for > additional CIDRs from VR, it's a blocker thing... > > 2018-01-11 0:52 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>: > >> I suppose the bug, reported by Wido prevents adding additional CIDRs to >> Network if IPv6 configured? If so, it's definitely a blocker thing because >> everyone expects it's possible, because the function is implemented in ACS. >> >> 2018-01-11 0:41 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>: >> >>> +1 what Dasn said. >>> >>> Wido - are you seeing (upgrade) failure, or something fails to work >>> without this fix in basic zone? >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 10:50:22 PM >>> To: dev >>> Cc: Rohit Yadav >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> >>> I think that we agreed in th3 past that a blocker is either something >>> that prevents ACS to start or upgrade, or something that breaks prior >>> functionality. >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl >>> <mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/10/2018 05:47 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> >>> I want to thank all the reviewers, contributors and PR authors for their >>> hard work, support and collaboration. We managed to review, test and merge >>> more than 100 PRs towards the 4.11 milestone! >>> >>> >>> Out of 11 open PRs on Monday, the list is down to 2 now which were >>> recently added features: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/3 >>> >>> >>> To keep up with the release schedule, I think it's time we should focus >>> on stabilizing master, testing it, fix any regressions and blockers. >>> >>> >>> I'll cut 4.11 branch on Monday (15th Jan) and start RC1 as per the >>> schedule and master will be open for PRs with following merge criteria: >>> >>> - Blocker fixes, especially those blocking the release >>> >>> - Test failure and regression fixes >>> >>> - Release related fixes for example - upgrade blockers, database path, >>> packaging and systemvmtemplate related etc. >>> >>> >>> Thoughts, objections? >>> >>> >>> Awesome! >>> >>> I'm looking for the definition for a blocker, I recently found this one: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2396 >>> >>> For us this is a big problem as we keep running into it, but probably >>> nobody else. I don't want to promote my own PR as a blocker, but what is >>> the definition? >>> >>> Because it's my own PR I didn't add the 4.11 milestone. >>> >>> Looking forward to 4.11! >>> >>> >>> Wido >>> >>> >>> - Rohit >>> >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Khosrow Moossavi <kmooss...@cloudops.com<mailto: >>> kmooss...@cloudops.com>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 8:59:30 PM >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> >>> +1 Daan and Rohit >>> >>> Khosrow Moossavi >>> >>> Cloud Infrastructure Developer >>> >>> t 514.447.3456 >>> >>> <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Boris Stoyanov < >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes let’s do that. >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 14:41, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl<mailto: >>> w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/08/2018 01:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> All, >>> Thank you everyone for your feedback. Given we're in agreement with >>> Daan's proposal, I'll summarize and add strategy: >>> - We'll freeze the 4.11 milestone to only these 9 PRs: >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/3 >>> - In addition, only blocker, test fixes, and release/packaging related >>> fixes may be accepted in master now. >>> - If we don't hear from authors within a day, the PRs may be removed >>> from the milestone. >>> - We'll re-assess the list again by EOD, Wed 10 Jan 2018. >>> Does this look agreeable? Thanks. >>> >>> Yes, it does! When the first RC comes out we should be able to run >>> tests, fix what's broken and focus in the release and 4.12 afterwards. >>> >>> Wido >>> >>> - Rohit >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto: >>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> >>> Sent: Monday, January 8, 2018 4:21:00 PM >>> To: dev >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11 >>> slow display of arrogance in reacting this time ; yeeaahhh >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> You again faster than me ))) >>> >>> 2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> :D tnx ) >>> Updated by my colleague already >>> >>> 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailt >>> o:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389 >>> Can you please review? >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> Sure. Got it. >>> >>> Will post update soon >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailt >>> o:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> : >>> >>> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be >>> argued >>> that >>> it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is >>> unthinkably >>> late, >>> but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads >>> to a >>> plethora of last minute PRs to include. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < >>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com<mailto:igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/clou >>> dstack/pull/2389 >>> into 4.11 >>> PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours. >>> >>> As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch. >>> >>> 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov < >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> : >>> >>> +1 Daan >>> >>> >>> boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland < >>> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com<mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Rohit, Ivan, >>> >>> I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone >>> can >>> still >>> go >>> in as long as active work on them continues. I have not >>> looked >>> at >>> Ivan's >>> PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is >>> actively >>> working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A >>> bigger >>> concern >>> is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are >>> potentially >>> conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get >>> the >>> set >>> list >>> in >>> (and blockers). >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev < >>> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com<mailto:kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Rohit, Devs, >>> >>> just consider adding: >>> >>> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/ >>> cloudstack/pull/2362 >>> [resouce >>> accounting blocker bug] >>> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/ >>> cloudstack/pull/2350 >>> [security >>> fix, enchancement] >>> >>> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final >>> review* >>> yet. >>> >>> >>> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav < >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> : >>> >>> All, >>> >>> >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 >>> Jan >>> 2018) >>> we >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept >>> critical/blocker >>> fixes, >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 >>> (est. >>> by >>> 15 >>> Jan >>> 2018). >>> >>> >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to >>> everyone >>> as >>> there >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand >>> authors >>> have >>> worked >>> hard to get them in. >>> >>> >>> Please share your thoughts, comments. If you're the author >>> of >>> such >>> an >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding >>> issues. >>> >>> >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan >>> is >>> acceptable >>> to everyone. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j >>> >>> >>> - Rohit >>> >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev >>> Bitworks Software, Ltd. >>> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15><tel:%2B7-923-414-1515> >>> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com><http://www.shapeblue.com> >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=53+Chandos+Place,+Covent+Garden,+London%C2%A0+WC2N&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> 4HSUK >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev >> Bitworks Software, Ltd. >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15> >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> >> >> > > > -- > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > Bitworks Software, Ltd. > Cell: +7-923-414-1515 <+7%20923%20414-15-15> > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > -- Daan
