Vadim Gritsenko wrote, On 26/08/2003 14.01:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:...
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
I also would like to see a bit more descriptive commit message. And may be entry in status.xml too.
As long as the portal is alpha this would imho only mess up the status.xml.
As soon as it's not alpha anymore, yes, it makes sense to add everything
to status.xml.
Then you will have to provide a blurb about portal in status.xml *before* next milestone/beta/rc/release, because portal was released once as part of 2.1 and users deserve to know what has been changed from 2.1 to <insert version number here - most probably 2.1.1>.
As I had outlined before, making blocks live in the same space makes it impossible to really see the difference from scratchpad ones and real ones, generating these issues.
Since blocks are not "scratchpad" anymore, and there is no hard distinction, I want to see the entry in status.xml now too.
I noticed that jtidy has been moved out of html block and into lib/optional. What will happen if I to remove jtidy from the lib/optional? Will this break the build?
Yepp, you can see it in the gump.xml dependency description.
But that means that we are busting build even more instead of fixing it?
The only real way in which it can be fixed is to do away with including libs in CVS, and instead getting them from the web and in a local repository.
I can set up such a system quite quickly if we decide to use it, using Krysalis Ruper (that does exactly this).
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------