Reinhard Poetz wrote:
From: Giacomo Pati


Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation?


AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM description
to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove the IDL docs.


WDOT?

I wouldn't object. At the very least the link off the main welcome page should not describe them as the "flow docs". They don't quite cut it for the new user.


Geoff

Reply via email to