From: Geoff Howard > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > From: Giacomo Pati > > > > > >>Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? > > > > > > AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM > description > > to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove > the IDL docs. > > > > WDOT? > > I wouldn't object. At the very least the link off the main > welcome page > should not describe them as the "flow docs". They don't quite cut it > for the new user.
Before deleting it we should disable them by default because their content is wrong. I'm not sure if I have time to do it today - if somebody else has time don't wait for me. Do we need a vote for deleting the IDL docs at all? Reinhard
