I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs.
Here my +1. -- Reinhard > -----Original Message----- > From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Documenting the FOM > > > > From: Geoff Howard > > > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > > From: Giacomo Pati > > > > > > > > >>Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation? > > > > > > > > > AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM > > description > > > to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove > > the IDL docs. > > > > > > WDOT? > > > > I wouldn't object. At the very least the link off the main > > welcome page > > should not describe them as the "flow docs". They don't > quite cut it > > for the new user. > > Before deleting it we should disable them by default because > their content is wrong. I'm not sure if I have time to do it > today - if somebody else has time don't wait for me. > > Do we need a vote for deleting the IDL docs at all? > > Reinhard >
