Antonio Gallardo wrote:

Hi:

Thanks for the help and solutions.

I prefer the xslt tranformation at woody template because:

1-write less code.
2-The definition clearly states it is a boolean value.
3-Seems to be a better separation of concerns.


AFAIK, the booleanfield is a special case and if it will be used just as a
rendering property (to a checkbox), then we can avois the use of boolean
field and leave just the normal field + define a attribute that will allow
it to render it as a checkbox.



Do you mean you want to remove <wd:booleanfield> and add a styling type="checkbox"?


Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -  http://www.orixo.com




Reply via email to