Sylvain Wallez dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >>Hi: >> >>Thanks for the help and solutions. >> >>I prefer the xslt tranformation at woody template because: >> >>1-write less code. >>2-The definition clearly states it is a boolean value. >>3-Seems to be a better separation of concerns. >> >> >>AFAIK, the booleanfield is a special case and if it will be used just as >> a >>rendering property (to a checkbox), then we can avois the use of boolean >>field and leave just the normal field + define a attribute that will >> allow >>it to render it as a checkbox. >> >> > > Do you mean you want to remove <wd:booleanfield> and add a styling > type="checkbox"?
Yep. This will be clear and for another part a "faster" parsing of definition. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
