Sorry, I don't understand that sentence :-/Do you mean you want to remove <wd:booleanfield> and add a styling type="checkbox"?
Yep. This will be clear and for another part a "faster" parsing of definition.
"Faster" parsing should mean one widget-type less I guess.
WDYT?
Sounds reasonable.
Sorry, not to me. I don't think checkbox fits naturally as a field styling:
- using a checkbox for a field with a selection-list only applies to lists having exactly 2 values.
Hmm, indeed, seeing it the other way around makes no sense.
- an HTML checkbox returns only a value or a null, but cannot switch between value1 and value2 without some hidden fields with JS tricks.
That's at least something is handable automatically.
Actually, I think we should add more stylings to booleanfield (e.g. list and radio) along with the ability to have a selection-list with exactly 2 items.
Ok.
Joerg
