Re: [CForms] - No @id generation for

[Daniel Fagerstrom]

Somewhat OT, I think that the current use of the id attribute in the 
Woody widget definition (WD) file is unfortunate. Id attributes are 
supposed to be unique in an XML document according to the standard, and 
as id in WD files rather describe a relative position in a widget 
hierarchy, there are no reason for them to be unique. IMO it would be 
better to use the attribute name "ref" for refering to relative 
positions as in XForms. See also 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25300.

What about replaceing "id" with "ref" in the WD files when we rename 
Woody to CForms?

/Daniel

Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 18.02.2004 11:36, Antonio Gallardo wrote:

I already changed my own Woody version with the same modification for 
the
same reason. So I think we need it.


Since it does harm nothing I think it is a good idea to add it.

Need we a VOTE, for this?


Na, not a formal vote for such a little change that does not even break 
somebody else's code. Just a few more opinions would be intereting. You 
have almost convinced me, I'm still only at -0.2 :)

Joerg