On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 14:10, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: > Somewhat OT, I think that the current use of the id attribute in the > Woody widget definition (WD) file is unfortunate. Id attributes are > supposed to be unique in an XML document according to the standard,
I don't think so. An attribute called "id" has no special meaning in XML. > and > as id in WD files rather describe a relative position in a widget > hierarchy, there are no reason for them to be unique. IMO it would be > better to use the attribute name "ref" for refering to relative > positions as in XForms. See also > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25300. > > What about replaceing "id" with "ref" in the WD files when we rename > Woody to CForms? I'm not really convinced. The "id" attribute defines the id for the widget, and does not reference it, as "ref" seems to suggest. <snip/> -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
