What about replaceing "id" with "ref" in the WD files when we rename Woody to CForms?
I'm not really convinced. The "id" attribute defines the id for the widget, and does not reference it, as "ref" seems to suggest.
That's true for the definition and I'm also against this change in the definition.
But what about the template? There it is indeed only a reference and so ref is more appropriate. The wt:widget-label/@id and wt:widget/@id referencing the same widget definition already point this out.
WDYT?
Joerg
