In the next few days I want (no promise ;-) to start with renaming Woody to CocoonForms. First I want to move the _core_ which means that I want to make one simple example run.
Of course, this renaming has impact on many names and in order to avoid doing the same thing twice I want to here other opinions on this:
namespaces: http://apache.org/cocoon/woody/definition/1.0 --> http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0
packages: org.apache.cocoon.woody.transformation --> org.apache.cocoon.forms.transformation
classnames: AbstractWoodyAction --> AbstractCocoonFormsAction
xconf: <woody-datatype logger="woody"> --> <forms-datatype logger="forms">
What do you think?
I don't do the whole transformation at once because I know that I don't have enough time. So I hope that some others jump in <hint/> ;-)
But this has also a technical impact: the libs (oro, reporter-expressions) have to move for some time to lib/optional (IIUC).
-- Reinhard
