Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

Reinhard Pötz wrote:

In the next few days I want (no promise ;-) to start with renaming Woody to CocoonForms. First I want to move the _core_ which means that I want to make one simple example run.



First of all, let's freeze cocoon woody - so we do not loose any patches in the process, and it is easier to operate frozen woody... I propose to start WOODY FREEZE tomorrow morning - if you have good patches lying on your drive - commit them now :-)

Yes please. I don't start the tranformation before tomorrow afternoon.




Before renaming namespaces. This should be a new block:
woody block --> forms block

yes.




Of course, this renaming has impact on many names and in order to avoid doing the same thing twice I want to here other opinions on this:

namespaces:
http://apache.org/cocoon/woody/definition/1.0
-->
http://apache.org/cocoon/forms/definition/1.0



+1



packages:
org.apache.cocoon.woody.transformation
-->
org.apache.cocoon.forms.transformation



+1



classnames:
AbstractWoodyAction
-->
AbstractCocoonFormsAction



I suggest AbstractFormsAction. It's already in Cocoon, so no reason to mention it.

ok





xconf:
<woody-datatype logger="woody">
-->
<forms-datatype logger="forms">

thanks Vadim!

--
Reinhard



Reply via email to