Le Vendredi, 5 mars 2004, � 13:18 Europe/Zurich, Reinhard P�tz a �crit :
... namespaces: .... packages: ... classnames: ... xconf: ... What do you think?
Quite frankly, I think changing implementation-specific names (packages, classes) is not worth the hassle.
I'd change just the namespaces maybe, assuming they *might* be used for another implementation besides woody in the future, the block name and mostly the documentation.
I don't mind keeping woody as the technical name in some places, IMHO the name change disruption is not worth it.
Changing package or class names is the smallest problem if you use Eclipse ;-)
...I don't do the whole transformation at once because I know that I don't have enough time. So I hope that some others jump in <hint/> ;-)...
And that's a big problem, the risk of having a half-finished renaming is big if we aim too high.
You could be right, so let's change the procedure:
1. create a new "cforms" block (BTW: I would set up the new block with the name: "cforms") 2. move Java and Xconf files 3. check in into CVS 4. write the stylesheet 5. move the examples
WDYT?
Would be nice if somebody could help me with 4 and 5. Any takers?
--
Reinhard
